Saturday, July 26, 2008  Search  
Go to WIF/GM site
Site Sections:
 Welcome: Register
(Login)

Home » POV » Reviews » Read Reviews


This is a photo.
Author:
Sheila Benson

 
Sheila Benson was the principal Los Angeles Times film critic from 1981-91, following which she was their Critic At Large, writing on all aspects of the cultural life of that city. She also has written for Cinemania/msn.com for which she was chief film critic and many other papers.
Click to view this authors full bio
If critics can be said to have favorites -- and they have -- early on Sheila was a particular champion of independent films, as they were finding their voice and their power. As a result, her reports from the earliest days of Telluride, Toronto, Mill Valley and the Sundance festivals found their way into what was then the "Industry"-centric Times.

Moving online, she was chief film critic for Microsoft's invaluable Cinemania from its birth to its death, 4 ½ years later. She has also contributed coverage, essays and interviews to Interview, Elle, Premiere, Film Comment, Variety, the San Francisco Examiner, the Seattle Weekly, London Telegraph's Weekend magazine, Canada's Globe and Mail American Film Magazine and the New York Times.

Affiliated with the National Society of Film Critics, FIPRESCI (the International Film Critics Association) and the Los Angeles Film Critics Association (1981-95), she has taught Critical Writing at UCLA and has been a jury member at the film festivals of Berlin, Toronto, Chicago, Montreal, Hawaii, Manila, Seattle, Aspen, Sundance/Park City, Taos, Banff and Palm Springs. In 1987, she was given the Vesta Award for Journalism for her contribution to the arts in Southern California. She wrote the narration for Chuck Workman's "The First 100 Years: A Celebration of American Film" for Bravo, and in 2004 wrote the critical essay for the DVD of Horton Foote's Tomorrow for Home Vision Entertainment.

Having moved to Washington in 1996, she now reviews for the Seattle Weekly.


View Editor's Note:
There is no editor's note for this article.
"Moonstruck"

There isn't a fuller or prettier moment in the enticing "Moonstruck" than Cher, still in opera clothes at daybreak,kicking a beer can up a silent Brooklyn Heights street, rapturously aware--for the first time--of life's fearful and astonishing possibilities.

As a young widow whose life suddenly shifts 180 degrees under the spell of an extraordinary full moon, hanging heavy over all of New York, Cher finally has a role that lets her comic sensibilities out for a romp. Pitted against some of best character actors anywhere--Vincent Gardenia, Julie Bovasso, Danny Aiello, Louis Guss,

Feodor Chaliapin and especially Olympia Dukakis as her mother--Cher drops, with a Brooklyn-Italian lilt, into a juicy romantic comedy character as though she'd been brought up in the neighborhood. "Moonstruck" is such nourishing comedy. It satisfies every hunger, especially the irrational ones that seem to hit hardest at holidays: hunger for impetuous romance and for the reassuring warmth of family; for reckless abandon and for knowing who we are and what we want.

An American movie with foreign-film sensibilities, "Moonstruck's" depths come from their perfect balance of writing and direction. Those talents are a new-to-the-screen writer, John Patrick Shanley, a first generation Irish-American playwright from the Bronx; and the veteran Norman Jewison, a Canadian director who has made loftier films ("Agnes of God," "Jesus Christ Superstar," "A Soldier's Story") but never a niftier one.

If ever two women knew who they were, it's Loretta (Cher) and Rose Castorini (Dukakis), a mother and daughter with a certainty about them which is devastatingly attractive. Rose's certainty might also come under the heading of dread: she's pretty positive that her husband Cosmo (Gardenia) is stepping out on her.

As for Loretta, as she goes around her Italian-accented neighborhood, doing taxes and bookkeeping, she combines the qualities of a mother, a great executive secretary and a great beauty.

But as a childless woman whose husband has been dead 7 years, she downplays her every asset mightily, pulling back that fairytale cloud of hair, ignoring the little crabgrass of grey that's appeared. As the film begins, she even becomes engaged to Johnny Cammareri (Danny Aiello), who's not above stimulating his scalp in public when he's nervous. Clearly, Mr. Johnny, in his early 40s, hasn't a romantic--or an impetuous--cell in his body.

Before he takes off to the bedside of his dying mother in Palermo, Mr. Johnny has only one crucial request: that his new fiance look up his younger brother, Ronny. His hope is that the bad blood between them will be washed away in the wave of good will for his and Loretta's wedding.

Well, we're all adults here. Even before we find out that Nicolas Cage is Ronny, an impassioned baker with a wooden hand and a soul as hot as his furnaces, we know that Mr. Johnny had better not dally long in Palermo. But even with our feet braced for the inevitable, "Moonstruck" has delights up its sleeve.

They come from Shanley's gorgeous dialogue: the tart, real talk of people who've lived together their lives long, filtered through a poet's sensibility. They come, too, from Jewison's mainspring-timing of these exchanges. A sample: Rose is awakened to hear that Loretta is engaged. "Do you love him, Loretta?" "No," her daughter answers, truthful to the last. "Good," her mother answers. "When you love them they drive you crazy, bcause they know they can."

This is lovely, insightful speech, delivered with the satisfying speed and snap of a card sharp shuffling a deck. All of "Moonstruck" is played this way, somewhere between a great fugue and a great baseball game. Musically, "Moonstruck" is built around "La Boheme" whose themes we see and hear at every turn. The lupine Ronny's more civilized side is his passion for grand opera, and in the movie's great Cinderella moment, he lures Loretta to "La Boheme"at the Met. (Shanley doesn't mess with Italian stereotypes--Loretta has no idea where to find the Met.)

"Moonstruck" themes are polar opposites: the inviolability of the family, and the question of why men need to run after women. The solid joys of the family are illustrated on every hand as--under the spell of this almost magical moon--couples of every age turn to one another with a sweet desire that no amount of time has staled.

Rose has decided sagely that men chase women because they fear death, but she needs corroboration. It comes from an unexpected meeting with a charming, thoroughly unprincipled college professor (John Mahoney, last seen in "Tin Men"). The filmmakers themselves seem ambivalent: if the movie ends with a heartfelt toast, "To family," it also gives a stricken, envious glance at the brief glories of the extra-marital encounter. (Anita Gillette contributes that bit of deliciousness.) And it puts in Mahoney's mouth one of the most charming rationales for the brief encounter that you'll ever hear.

Mahoney's deftness is only one part of this perfect mosaic of performances. Cage attacks the role of Ronny with a nice balance between unbridled romanticism and tongue-in-cheek seriousness; he's marvelous. Everyone is, yet Olympia Dukakis seems to have an extra sheen of maturity and wisdom that moves her work from authoritative into memorable.

The production itself is a joy, from the photography of David Watkin who seems to give every scene its own magical glow, to Philip Rosenberg's fine production design, Lou Lombardo's crisp editing and the costumes of Theoni Aldredge, perfect, right down to Cher's ruby slippers, which carry their own movie memories. And whether it came from editor, director or writer, that shimmering dissolve from the moon itself to the lights of Mr. Johnny's approaching plane is what the craft of movie-making is all about.



Back to Select Takes: Sheila Benson


 

Copyright© 2007 - Women In Film   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement